Re: Olga Kharif is an Intel whore. She might as well be on staff at Intel PR.
Let's see:
A. Her case on Intel catching up is based on commentary from an In-Stat analyst Jim McGregor, not her own editorial.
B. She presents AMD's current advantages quite clearly in the beginning, and leaves AMD with the benefit of the doubt in the last paragraph.
C. You ignore points A and B.
D. You make no mention of where you disagree, nor do you present any refutable arguments.
E. You resort to profanity and attacking the author rather than the content.
No reasonable person should take you seriously, unless they plan to bet against you. It's a classic case of contrarian indicator.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
