Replies to post #67801 on Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD)

[muzohub]

so verbatim repeating another seemingly intel pr source is different from being a pr source, how again ?

how many times does she need to quote "intel is gonna catchup" in her non-editorial editorial ?

why do you feel the need to defend every seemingly intel pr outlet ?

"because i are one" sounds like a likely answer.

finally don't worry not many people take you seriously either, only enough to poke you at times.

[jhalada]

wbmw,

E. You resort to profanity and attacking the author rather than the content.

Is it your opinion than that the term "whore" should be used only to describe those selling sexual favors, as opposed to those selling one's integrity?

Here is what dictionary.com says:
whore ( P ) Pronunciation Key (hôr, hr)
n.
A prostitute.
A person considered sexually promiscuous.
A person considered as having compromised principles for personal gain.

intr.v. whored, whor·ing, whores
To associate or have sexual relations with prostitutes or a prostitute.
To accept payment in exchange for sexual relations.
To compromise one's principles for personal gain.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=whore

While we don't have evidence of personal gain for Olga, we have a plenty of evidence of compromise of the principles of journalistic principles.

Joe

[chipdesigner]

Let's see:

A. I pointed out that this IW has a long and storied history of bashing AMD in her 'articles'.

B. Any serious investor wants to understand the extent of any bias in the sources of 'information' they consider.

C. Are *you* actually Olga Kharif, or something? :)