News Focus
News Focus
icon url

janice shell

12/08/05 6:42 PM

#195459 RE: gump90 #195455

If as you say it does not happen .. then why is it topical these days ?

Because people like Gayle Essary and Gary Valinoti started the whole thing for reasons of their own. Essary runs a promotional company. Valinoti, who just got sacked for millions in fines by the SEC, wanted to cover up his own peculations, and his association with Mark Valentine.

And as I've said before, the whole campaign confuses the marks, and is designed to distract their attention from the evils of toxic financing. Naturally it's also designed to distract attention from the real reasons crappy companies fail.

How can we all be wrong, and you right ?

Wouldn't be the first time.

And remember that Stoecklein never said a word about naked shorting until he saw that he might be able to use Frizzy to his advantage. Even then, he didn't insist on it to the SEC.

The fax campaign really was not necessary...

That's right, and that should make you suspicious.
icon url

hasher

12/08/05 7:18 PM

#195460 RE: gump90 #195455


This deal is starting to wind up tighter than a vise

Oh stop trying to be so dramatic..where does it indicate anything of the sort

icon url

Scruffy_too

12/08/05 7:24 PM

#195461 RE: gump90 #195455

It's certainly "show and tell" time, Gump, and I think it's getting everyone's attention. If CMKX isn't naked shorted, then there is simply no such thing, IMO. Want to bet that there will be a follow-up fax-in campaign for Account statements if we don't get our certs by a certain date?

I don't think I will be too worried if I don't get my certs by the deadline. I figure there might be a better chance of getting some real reward from the brokers, etc., as opposed to more restricted share dividends through the company LOL.

GLTY

Scruffy