News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Fritz

05/06/13 6:48 PM

#8827 RE: texkengold #8826

Funny, because if there was grounds for litigation don't you think it would have happened by not..

IT all a ruse to try and fleece SNTL investors.

Revenues cannot be denied... stick around to see them
icon url

Somuchcents

05/06/13 7:07 PM

#8828 RE: texkengold #8826

Again, this is head in the sand stuff. The SEC did not advise the company on how to become compliant. The SEC advised the company that it COULD NOT not become compliant. Yours have see a posting with a legal background that says he would have sued MO if it had not rescinded. It may be conveniant for you to ignore this but that is hardly fair to other shareholders. IMO, to say that NHSH MO, or the rights to it is misleading to shareholders. Simply not based on facts. NHSH could challenge the rescission, which they do not seems to have attempted or even challenged. Why does somebody suggest independant arbitration? I understand that MO suggested that for the qasp issues but it was turned down by the Qasp managment. Would that not be a sensible arrangent for NHSH? If you are confident of the outcome, what is the down side?