Again, this is head in the sand stuff. The SEC did not advise the company on how to become compliant. The SEC advised the company that it COULD NOT not become compliant. Yours have see a posting with a legal background that says he would have sued MO if it had not rescinded. It may be conveniant for you to ignore this but that is hardly fair to other shareholders. IMO, to say that NHSH MO, or the rights to it is misleading to shareholders. Simply not based on facts. NHSH could challenge the rescission, which they do not seems to have attempted or even challenged. Why does somebody suggest independant arbitration? I understand that MO suggested that for the qasp issues but it was turned down by the Qasp managment. Would that not be a sensible arrangent for NHSH? If you are confident of the outcome, what is the down side?