Replies to post #12343 on ParaFin Corporation (PFNO)

[Grifter]

Here’s a quick synopsis. Hope this satisfies you.

February 2012, ING agrees to sit down with PFNO and look at the bonds:
February PR

Two months later, ING gives some sort of credibility to the bonds:
April PR

If ING thought for one second they were totally false, why even deal with PFNO for so many years?

Ooop! Now all of a sudden another company and more lawyers are on board helping PFNO with the bonds ING doesn’t want to pay. Sounds like there’s something here.

October PR

So:
PFNO believes it has real bonds, check.
ING sits down to address the bonds because they could be real, check
A third-party comes on board to push ING to settle because they believe the bonds are real, check.
ING just gets hit with millions in fines for running a bad business, check.

Waiter – check please!