Replies to post #10029 on Raystream Inc.(fka RAYS)

[avocet]

Accountability is a rare beast indeed when you mention the name of RAYSTREAM.

Supposition is always the direct byproduct of a limited number of facts and documented data.

Trying to fill in the blanks is what these boards are mostly all about.

Deducing the unknown from the known.

The SEC has a HUGE body of facts and leads outside the lawsuit filed against RAYSTREAM and six of its principal members.

Brian PETERSEN
Nadia CHRISTIAN
Carmen TELLEZ
Tan SIEKMANN
Roman RUMPF
Tom FRIEDLI

I don't agree that legal facts involved with the lawsuit against RAYSTREAM for business impropriety are outside the legal jurisdiction or interest of the SEC.

[janice shell]

Anyone involved would. Petersen, for example. He wouldn't talk to me, but that was when the stock was running.

Siekmann and Abellan would also know, but they won't be talking to anyone.

[avocet]

May 22 will be the 1-year anniversary of the birth of your alias on this board or any board for that matter.

A total of 18 posts for an entire year. And 5 of those in one day so far!

Your involvement has far and away been one of monitoring these posts and quickly correcting inaccuracies when you see them.

You should have discovered by now that Janice Shell is a lover of the truth and honest business enterprises and so am I.

Any time you can wage in with important and useful data about RAYSTREAM and the people behind it, by all means, join in the conversation.

Help us to fill in the blanks here!

And with correct information of course.