News Focus
News Focus
Replies to #773 on The Black Box
icon url

wahz

03/23/03 12:31 PM

#775 RE: LG #773

I agree completely.

The specific reason for my outburst was I saw a post, and then more posts, where a technique or techniques, were distorted purposely to support the posters position in the market. It's one thing to be wrong, that wasn't the issue, but this was a matter of purposeful deception. I know the posters know what they are doing, and they were saying indicators were saying a direction that they clearly were not.
This is real money, I assume, that folks are using and it is awful to deceive them.

It is all about probabilities, there are no certainties.

To everyone here, LG is the best teacher of ta, and his way doesn't cause frenetic activity that I can assure you will likely eventually come back to bite the trader.




icon url

exp

03/23/03 2:00 PM

#776 RE: LG #773

very true...so isn't the conclusion to quantify those probabilities a bit depending on a a given indicator, pattern, or technique in order to systematize them into a (partially) mechanical system? or, is any type of a (partially) mechanical system inferior to trading based on one's total experience in your opinion?

tia...george