News Focus
News Focus
icon url

PEACHMAN

02/25/13 2:38 PM

#14675 RE: Ecomike #14674

Ecomike,I appreciate your educational, analytical,engineering,qualitative,and quantitative statistical feedback concerning MVTG but an occasional to da moon mixed in is ok too LOL
icon url

smack1

02/25/13 3:07 PM

#14679 RE: Ecomike #14674

MVTG ... Still wrapped up in this vs Van P's article... CCS is willing to capture c02 & ram it deep into the earth at costs they can't deal with, MVTG is able to capture c02 & convert it into a safe, usable, cost effective, revenue producing product... Take a look at Van P's photo, he couldn't make it as a used car salesman, so opted for a form of journalism... Thx for getting back on the other issue, Eco, have to deal with it later, I believe I'm at my post limit for the day... GO MVTG!!!
icon url

maybe_this_time

02/25/13 3:32 PM

#14681 RE: Ecomike #14674

That elements chart in the Mantra brochure has a lot of possible by-products from the ERC process. So the initial facilities at Lefarge will have two income streams, Formic Acid and Oxygen potentially? Oh, forgot, three, carbon credits.

I noticed they cited $25 per ton for the carbon capture cost component of in the summary you supplied. It appears that's the ultimate carbon tax they are looking at I think. So carbon capture technologies need to be $25 per ton of CO2 or companies will just pay the tax. MVTG beats that with a profit making by-product!

When do you believe they will break ground for the Lefarge pilot plant?