News Focus
News Focus
icon url

leifsmith

02/22/13 2:29 PM

#65821 RE: JG36 #65820

A lot of work has been done since those charts were drawn. I think everything is in place for faster progress than in the past. Missed goals? yes. But I don't think those pertain to the present or give us grounds for prediction.
icon url

Echo20

02/22/13 2:37 PM

#65823 RE: JG36 #65820

JG36

That information that you showed is impressive but in there,

There is also the focusing from the many formulas in pre-clinical
tests, to one, FLUCIDE.

Then SUPer FLUCIDE, ORAL FLUCIDE and INTRAVENIOUS FLUCIDE for immunocompromised patients in hospitals.

Dc Seymour has stated he has a lot of colleages that work in/with immunocompromised patients and they had been asking him to do something for those patients. So he did.

The immunocompromised FLUCIDE could bring about an ORPHAN DESIGNATION for FLUCIDE and NNVC that could be worth a few hundred million dollars and faster results from the FDA.

Then that to the FDA.

Then with ORAL FLUCIDE or Intravenious FLUCIDE?

Then the manufacturing stringency came up.

Add that up with the SMALL COMPANY EFFECTS and here we are in 2013 with a new medical platform now working on TOX studies.

The amount of red tape was not anticipated fully.

No one notes any counter intentions to NNVC and FLUCIDE from anywhere so far.

Good luck to FLUCIDE and NNVC.

OUR LITTLE BABY INVESTMENT.

Echo20
icon url

BonelessCat

02/22/13 2:46 PM

#65824 RE: JG36 #65820

Something happened between 2007 and the present, something outside management's control. First pharmaceuticals took a hit and what had been open season acquisition going into 2007 turned into a vacuum of deals by 2009. Funding and funds available dried up. No one funded anything for a year straight. When funding began to trickle in again it went to the politically and economically well-connected. Almost no progress was seen in the biopharma sector for 18 months from 2008 to mid-2009.

Something that management did have control over, but were a bit green and naive, was funding arrangements and the prospect of a partnership. In 2007, NNVC requested a $5 million defense bill earmark but was authorized $2 million in the final version passed by both the house and the senate. In a separate funding bill from the house, the bill that actually distributes budget items, in transposing the earmark's budget identification number, a zero was dropped from the item release, a number that must match exactly as the authorization is an act of law. The budget item $2 million could not be released. There were more in the series of unfortunate events, but to me these two alone account for almost 3 years of delay from the original projection.

So, there is much more to this story than a product pipeline, there are the politics, the industrial intrigue, the threat to current therapies from disruptive technology, among other things.
icon url

daBoze

02/22/13 3:14 PM

#65829 RE: JG36 #65820

I have already answered that. You're now being obtuse.