News Focus
News Focus
icon url

rbtree

01/13/13 2:43 PM

#121017 RE: Sooah #121004

one miner signed preliminary documents for the Cinco purchase. There were two different parties as of this date. As of December 13, we are informed that a party (later identified as Kinross) signed a C.A. for Cinco and G.C. So, we have two different parties with signed documents.

Repeating the unfounded nonsense put out by a suspended scam company does little for your credibility.
icon url

janice shell

01/13/13 3:07 PM

#121041 RE: Sooah #121004

Yes, as of November 14th, one miner signed preliminary documents for the Cinco purchase. There were two different parties as of this date. As of December 13, we are informed that a party (later identified as Kinross) signed a C.A. for Cinco and G.C. So, we have two different parties with signed documents.

Only according to the company, whose word has been proved to be unreliable.

I suppose it's conceivable that they signed another CA. They're very common documents, and SRGE presumably had a stack of them ready to go.

It's also conceivable that they just made it all up.