News Focus
News Focus
icon url

tob999

01/10/13 6:30 AM

#118444 RE: CyberCall™ #118442

You are absolutely correct CC! And that participant is NITE.

I know that there was a shorter out there. The SEC whistle blower act is not fail proof. I'll bet the person or entity that was feeding the information to the SEC has a connection to a market short participant.

This is a fact......the informant works for someone that was leaning on the stock.

NO ONE CAN DISPUTE THIS FACT.

icon url

mc67

01/10/13 8:06 AM

#118463 RE: CyberCall™ #118442

GOOD POST !! eom
icon url

sunspotter

01/10/13 9:11 AM

#118484 RE: CyberCall™ #118442

"This is a fact......the informant works for someone that was leaning on the stock.

NO ONE CAN DISPUTE THIS FACT."


Yes, they can, and I and many others do. Not least because there's not a shred of evidence for that ludicrous contention.

SRGE was suspended because it's obviously a scam. If anyone was deep-pocketed enough to be short (and it's very expensive to be a retail short on a penny stock) then they bet on what was a very reasonable assumption - that a sister scam to SAEI would be similarly suspended by SEC once they started issuing PRs that were demonstrably false.

End of story - no need for any baseless conspiracy theories.
icon url

lucky, mydog

01/10/13 9:14 AM

#118487 RE: CyberCall™ #118442

NO ONE CAN DISPUTE THIS FACT.

lol. really? hardly a fact at all. if you know this is a fact, provide the evidence because without it it is a myth.
icon url

janice shell

01/10/13 1:20 PM

#118692 RE: CyberCall™ #118442

This is a fact......the informant works for someone that was leaning on the stock.

NO ONE CAN DISPUTE THIS FACT.


And what makes you think only one person complained to the SEC about SRGE, rather than, say, dozens?

I see this all the time: aggrieved shareholders believe a single Evil Entity wanted to kill the stock. Not so. First, the SEC is more likely to pay attention to complaints if it receives quite a few of them. Second, they don't move on complaints alone; they verify the information.

Third, you should try using the TCR form sometime. You have to give them your real name, with real contact info. They're unlikely to take you seriously if you don't.

Fourth, it's clear by now that the SEC's been looking at SRGE for quite awhile, not just the last couple of months, much less the last few weeks.

And finally, short interest in SRGE is negligible.