News Focus
News Focus
icon url

TSXminer

11/01/05 12:35 PM

#191168 RE: gump90 #191162

Gump: IMHO none of the CMKX shareholders will ever receive any ETGMF shares, unless they're insiders with some kind of scummy prefered share class.
icon url

tortradr

11/01/05 1:37 PM

#191195 RE: gump90 #191162

On another tangent, I would be interested on your take on the Barrick/Placer play. Methinks we'll see soon that this is just the beginnings of Munk's empire building and Goldcorp better be watching its back door.
icon url

Scruffy_too

11/01/05 8:50 PM

#191303 RE: gump90 #191162

Gump, present regulations seem to be based upon the concept of accountability, don't they? Anything wrong with that?

Why should the company (or anyone else) be responsible to cover Shorty's (or the company's) misdeeds when the real problem here is simply one of non-enforcement? Isn't this where things have been leaving the tracks? Isn't this where we find our solution?

GLTY!

Scruffy