Better than that. Remember, half the population gets placebo or RFA-only. So if there's a 100% improvement in the entire population that translates into a 200% improvement in the ThermoDox group,
Also the stats you cite don't seem to include distant recurrence which I believe is significant, possibly as high as local for large tumors?
That's an extra 120 patients currently showing no disease progression thanks to ThermoDox.
Out of the 380 PFS events, I believe:
250 got placebo 130 got ThermoDox
Factor in that I'm forced, in part, to use data based on often small tumors only....
And we should beat 100% easy vs. 33% primary goal.
350 patients got RFA-only and 71% showing disease-progression so far vs. 350 patients got ThermoDox and 37% showing disease-progression so far
This data would suggest ThermoDox changes it from a disease with little hope to a disease with much hope, though still very dangerous, but will potentially save some lives and certain extend many many many lives much longer.
And, of course, the better it works for a tough nut to crack HCC the higher the hope/speculation for other cancers/diseases. Perhaps that's why CLSN went after one of the toughest ones first.