Replies to post #2139 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[RubeSilver]

On the plus side, I will wager that Opsis has been to our labs on more than one occasion. I think the science end is progressing as well as can be expected. We just wasted three years though while Marcelli sat on his hands and let the minor leagues run the show.

Six,

You profiles are scary. Except for Babu and Greenlee, you are spot on. No way Norwood was coming here as he is tenured and has a great position out in Arizona. No way he gives that up for the warm climate of Delaware. I do wonder if Marcelli ever graduated from college and also some of his other credentials.

We have two major things going for the company. Not knowing where the SLM stands, Michelson and the possible merger are at the forefront. If we fail on both, I do not want to think where the PPS will be . No one will want to invest here.

[inversor86]

I haven't doubted the science. If you do then I have no idea why you own shares in the first place. No LSS would be involved for this long without reason. While the qualifications of Bapu and Greenlee aren't 100% clear I think Dave Eaton's are not debatable.

This is not directed at you six. Something that is consistently overlooked here is that no company would want something that can not be produced consistently. It's barely been 2 months since one of the three hit that goal. So to at this point in time have still expected contracts long ago isn't logical.

The fact that contracts were inferred by mgmt is a whole other story. That is what caught me off guard at the share holders meeting. I had no idea they weren't able to make Perk/NR/Indigo consistently. This is the core of my issue with the company. Why would they suggest contracts were likely if the products weren't at a level that is commercially acceptable? Could they really not have known that was the case? I suppose it's possible since the materials are totally unique. I feel like that wasn't explained. I assumed those "intriguing" results didn't match up and brought plans to a grinding halt. This prompted additional hires and the building of a lab and testing facility to correct the problem.

Currently they're possibly merging/acquiring a revenue producing company. That will be a decent fall back for us should Lightwave ultimately fail to achieve any of it's goals. It would basically be a way for the other company to go public.

I don't want anyone to think I don't believe in this. But there are some things I don't like and the only good time to address them is during silent periods. I will not stick my head in the sand, this isn't Happy Valley.