I think it is clear enough that SRSR doesn't need to re-write the basic industry standards of performance in conducting basic tasks... just to make an excuse for your feigned "confusion".
"some one is trying to perpetuate a fraud and cause concern for people to question their holdings"
Seems there's very little point in being that shy about it... AFTER its been made so blatantly obvious...
Clearly, what we see exposed now is "an" answer... to some things.
Obviously, its not the only answer... to all things.
Just another one of those issues re something we see that has clearly meaningful market impact, that also seems it is a thing that the management aren't close to being responsible for controlling ?
I appreciate that their recent PR... did expose all that it did...
In the mining world it's standard practice to take a sample of the population you send and test it yourself. We as investors do not see it as PR-worthy but Scott knows his mining audience look for this DD on the part of SRSR and he wants to demonstrate and update them on the DD work the company is doing or has done since the PR will always be there for historical purposes for future potential investors to refer to. Scott is thinking smartly and ahead.