News Focus
News Focus
icon url

CGardener

12/13/12 11:52 AM

#36078 RE: janice shell #36076

Well wouldn't you refuse to disclose that you had no feasibility study until you had a CA in place? LOL.

I'm waiting to see if posters start contacting every mining company they can think of (or at least those who might fit BB's "hints") to see if they will confirm the "relationship" with SRGE. Instead of just pissing off SCCO like last month, they can piss off a big chunk of the industry.
icon url

CGardener

12/13/12 3:56 PM

#36093 RE: janice shell #36076

Another corner they've painted themselves into. They've committed to OTCBB uplisting, which means a Form 10 -- which means a feasibility study (or not, but then they'll be dropping most of their current "valuation" disclosures), Guide 7, capitalization, exhibit filings (won't those debt financing docs be interesting?), etc., all of which will be out there to be picked apart by the SEC staff in the review process, by careful readers, by potential business partners, etc. No Form 10 filing by them (to try to avoid all of those issues) undoubtedly reduces the number of potential dance partners and/or what anyone would be willing to pay for them.