Replies to post #36061 on DD Support Board and Research Team

[samsamsamiam]

"As for my <9:42am> comment to Sam, I'm sure it was taken as meant from my side evidenced by the usual response from that side :) That was just "friendly" chatting as always and it should never be construed as confirmation of something definitive coming from SRGE today.

Did I drop a name on the forum last night? Of course not. I don't play that kind of game, although I must admit the game of SRGE Hangman was fun and enjoyed by all. :)

Oh really? seems to me she had quite a few jumping through hoops to name the company as she methodically "dropped" a letter or two in the name of the J/V partner. If that is not a GAME I don't know what is.

ENJOYED BY ALL? I think the investors that lost 75% of their money in the past week listening to these touts and had a rather brutalizing day yesterday could certainly not have been "having fun" with a game like that.
Giving them all hope like that? that is right up there with the cruel joke (and I do consider it cruel) handing out that $16k cash dividend that resulted in even more buying and adding to their SRGE share count.
Someone mentioned whether it could be considered a type of Ponzi scheme - in some ways when you think about it - how much money did the company MAKE off that dividend "play" - way more than the $16k they handed out.

[rbtree]

disgraceful and then some...