News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Lone Ranger 2

12/10/12 1:52 PM

#79059 RE: rjbluesky #79043

NOPE.

That makes no sense.

the 500 mil could be for the JV of the large NYSE firm



If there was a JV why would SRGE issue a half billion shares of Southridge to the JV partner?
LOL That would include the other mines that they also do not own.
SRGE is just trying to cover up their own controlled share dumping.
icon url

flemdog33

12/10/12 1:56 PM

#79067 RE: rjbluesky #79043

If they give them 600m for the mine they would own the mine. I don't understand where the 500m shares come into play. Company A buys a mine for 600m dollars. They now own the mine. Why would SRGE now give them shares? If SRGE were buying the mine than giving them shares for the purchase could make sense. But not the other way around. If SRGE does indeed own the mine than they hold all the cards and would not have to issue shares for anything IMO.