lickily: It appears that you don't understand that we simply have a difference of opinion and that's fine.
My statement was not a claim of fact, but simply what I "believe" is the "likely" scenario. Furthermore, I gave the reason I have formed this opinion.
You disagree and have a different opinion and gave the reason for your opinion (that that vendors may actually have accepted stock that is worth less than what they were owed just to get "something" rather than nothing).
We simply disagree. Debates are made of different opinions. I think this boars would benefit from healthy (non-attacking) debates.
If you reread my post that you too exception to, I was clearly stating an opinion and never claimed a factual situation.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
