News Focus
News Focus
icon url

chipguy

11/19/12 3:25 PM

#113823 RE: ibc #113817

Intel WAS in the phone market with their XScale
product. Otellini exited the phone market and targeted Atom at a
market segment directly above phones with UMPC. Because of this
strategic mis-step, Intel lost out in mobile.


Lost out? I'd say they are down a field goal early in the first
quarter in mobile. This is going to be a VERY long game and no
one has a deeper or more talented team.

Going with x86 has made Intel late to the phone market but it is
the golden product differentiation in the MPU industry. Staying
with XScale meant being just one of the ARM pack and slugging
it out on pricing while kicking back bottom line dollars to ARMH.

Controlling the architecture as well as the process and design
is the formula for offering better, harder to clone, and higher
margin products in any MPU segment. It is no accident that TI,
a historically strong player in DSP and highly integrated digital
ICs, has decided to get out of the mobile processor market, it is
going to be a bloodbath among all the me-too ARM players.

IMO five years from now dropping XScale and pushing x86 across
the entire computing spectrum will be considered the smart move
that extended Intel's dominance across another computing market.
icon url

RGood

11/19/12 4:55 PM

#113826 RE: ibc #113817

IBC,

I have to say bullshit - complete bullshit.
Who the hell were you working for AMD or some harddrive company.
You must have been sleeping and you still are.
Fricken amazing.

Ronster
icon url

RGood

11/19/12 4:58 PM

#113827 RE: ibc #113817

IBC,

You are a youngster in the PC age.
25 yrs plus for me.
You obviously didn't see all the horescrap that PO had to deal with from AMD. He did it very well.
You must be worshipping at the alter of Jerry Sanders or something.
One major thing you have conviently forgotten is the horrible mess that PO had clean up after Barrett left.
He turned the company completely around and did it quite well.

Ronster