Dyna I am not as convinced as you on the
contract issue. Was there only one contract who
knows at this point. Its all 2nd hand BS that the
courts will decide. I guess the bottom line here
for me is the products they have. One or more of
these products in my opinion will be sold. If the
products were weak to average then that would be
a different story. Are there better people to bring
them to the markett or sell them probably. Like I
said before its not like they(G's)didn't try to get the
sales or marketting area in order. Was it there
fault it blew up in there face maybe. Were they
looking out for the best interest for the company
when getting CXO out of there, I think so.
So to some it all up what you are saying is because
JG talks like an ------- sometimes, because the G's
based on what the public knows, quote unquote( public
knows), signed a contract that a smart person wouldn't
have, again in your words, and, well a few other G's
things that I missed, the smart move is to sell and get
out.
Do you really think we the public knows everything that
is going on here. To base a move like you made
by selling all your shares based on what the public knows
on these issues is pritty, well you know.
Like I said back in May give or take, the CXO knows, and
will loose big, big, bucks when the deal goes down. That
commision of 8% or so will be huge.
Why don't you fess up to why your here still. If your short
say it no big deal. If your a CXO fan fine. Or are you just
pissed off because you did sell and loose $. Be an adult
and fess up.
Trucker
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
