Replies to post #3674 on CurAegis Technologies Inc (fka CRGS)

[dread50above]

dyna, at the time I wrote that intro, I was told by the G's that Dick would be joining us. You are absolutely correct that he never made it into the room although even you know he was in the office and just outside the board room. Not that means he was 'close enough"-- only that I believe the original plan was for him to join us. For whatever reason, he didn't and frankly, I never went back to re-read what I had written. As you saw, I was typing as fast as could.

If you've got a problem with my credibility because of that, so be it. You were also the guy who had a major problem with my reporting of the tax issue within the G's family and JG himself verified it at that meeting with you present.

[dread50above]

By the way, the contract in dispute is from June 2005, not "over one year" ago. Now you've lost all credibility......

[zendo]

I don't know the mechanics of how these things are handled---I'm assuming electronically as opposed to a guy going to a dead drop with microfilm in a hollow tooth. If that's the case it would make sense to me that the Corp. counsel would handle it.
1) I have to agree with a previous poster that whatever the eventual outcome this whole contract thing has been a huge cluster ---- and a major distraction.
2) I think other posters have opined that in the long run it probably won't matter and I agree with that---If a substantive deal is struck the stock will respond; if not, at best, we will dawdle along going nowhere.
3) I couldn't seem to locate the CXO home page using Google so I couldn't check on what they actually said---ie how it was worded.