News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Fiber_In_My_Hootchie

10/24/12 4:01 PM

#58833 RE: resolve #58832

That number sounds better.

I'm confused with this statement on page 23:

"T-Mobile was and remains the only major cell phone provider to offer UMA equipped devices to it's customers."

Are they saying that T-Mobile is the only cell phone provider infringing?
icon url

HighRider

10/24/12 4:02 PM

#58834 RE: resolve #58832

I believe you could be correct. The cpa guys were merely looking at what they could reasonably call direct expenses. With the tech expert saying he believes they infringed 24 of 30 claims, that is in itself huge. Of course both sides have a story to tell, but it's interesting that so far Tmob is not allowing the necessary documents to be given to these experts. They are also back to fighting the case with invalidity arguments. I hope the judge will soon put the halt to that idea and move this along. It is the first time we've gotten a glimpse at potential damages and I like what I'm seeing.
icon url

litton51

10/24/12 4:03 PM

#58835 RE: resolve #58832

1. Where can one read this report?

2. A $300 billion judgment with treble damages seems a little rich.