I believe you could be correct. The cpa guys were merely looking at what they could reasonably call direct expenses. With the tech expert saying he believes they infringed 24 of 30 claims, that is in itself huge. Of course both sides have a story to tell, but it's interesting that so far Tmob is not allowing the necessary documents to be given to these experts. They are also back to fighting the case with invalidity arguments. I hope the judge will soon put the halt to that idea and move this along. It is the first time we've gotten a glimpse at potential damages and I like what I'm seeing.