When one represents as a current fact something that is no longer current, one is misrepersenting that fact. To continue to use the Alaska CBM effort as an "accomplishment" of the company in misrepresenting what once was as something that still is Do we need to debate what the meaning of "is" is?
Again let them tell us then instead of continue to promote it. It is very misleading IMO. iF i DID NOT KNOW BETTER AND i WAS A NEW INVESTOR DOING dd i WOULD THINK FOR SURE THEY HAD this CBM project going as we speak.
Again do they have any type of assets on this CBM well or not???? If not IMO they need to stop trying to IMO make it appear that they do.