Replies to post #58647 on Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[HighRider]

Former unelected management caused the whole thing. They were over their head in their ability to understand basic human nature, among other things. They did not read or if they did read, didn't have the ability to understand the COI and Bylaws. I don't put this on the attorneys.

You need to look at the positives.
Calypso has gotten rid of an accruing liability, former unelected management. 
Calypso still owns the 923.
The Tmob case is progressing. 
There is no infighting for control. 
We have the potential to end up with CASH.
The daic parties have been neutralized and are now supporting Calypso's efforts. 
We have someone overseeing the 923 that doesn't have a horse in the race and who is being held accountable by a legitimate legal authority.

[downsideup]

That's wrong in every aspect, in general, and in detail... and it serves as a perfect statement of proof re why the Delaware court HAD to put CLYW into receivership, first, in the public interest... to prevent the result in the corruption of the public interest that would result from accepting exactly that sort of idiocy in purposeful advocacy of criminal action. And, then, the court also had an obligation to protect shareholders from continuing to be violated as a result of the choices made by the advocates of that sort of purposeful error.

It leaves wide open the question of whose interest was being served, and how, by introducing that sort of abject idiocy in error into the direction of company affairs. Where DID that posse of clowns come from ? Why were they thought to be useful ?

It wasn't due to Williams. The clowns driving the CLYW clown car were already firmly in control of the stage long before he arrived on the scene. Williams tried, repeatedly, to bring the circus act to a proper conclusion, to enable moving along to the next act. He repeatedly failed in that effort... until he succeeded, finally, only by taking it back to Delaware.

Clowns do have a role that they play... entertaining and distracting us with their unassuming cupidity and stupid antics... whether they're aware they are serving that purpose, or not. You don't blame the court jester... for the disruptions resulting from his occupying that space in the courtyard that has been reserved for him... to enable him in providing that distraction by assailing others against their will... with the temporary blessing of the sovereign.

So, the clowns you see driving the clown car, running with scissors, and playing with matches ... probably aren't responsible for ending up "in charge" of the circus... if and when they do somehow appear to end up "in charge". That's still true.. even when the clearly intended result in the event... is expected to provide a natural "inevitability"... leading to the complete failure and eventual destruction of the circus.

So. Who put the clowns in charge ?

It wasn't the shareholders... who were being denied the right to vote to expel them.

At CLYW, it doesn't matter, right now, that the clowns were purposefully selected, and left in charge... because the Delaware court seems to have recognized the problem and prevented them from succeeding in destroying what they were intended to destroy...

That the clowns STILL don't get it... while they provide endless proof of the fact ?

LOL!!! Perfect.

"Additionally, if the attorneys were smart, on both sides, they should have advised DW and CLYW not to take the vote result to Delware due to that court order not being fulfilled."

LOL!!!

It may be reasonable in self interest, for a criminal, when breaking the law, to want to avoid jurisdictions where there is an outstanding warrant...

But, wrongly assuming that interest should and will be shared by the victims of their crimes, and the officers of the court ?

It's hard to fathom anyone being THAT stupid... but, I've been forced to learn to accept the fact that some people are.

Clowns, and court jesters only more, should not confuse being granted a space... in the ring, or in the courtyard... from which they can, for a time, heckle others, whether to distract the audience, or to amuse the sovereign... with a permanent grant of sovereign immunity.

Amusing or not, jesters have always tended to have a remarkably short half lives... when they've grown tiresome. It's a job without much upward mobility. It is too obvious as error for any jester to think that the tolerance of the audience, who are being forced to tolerate being made the victims of their pranks for a time... by the same force that provides the jester a space... means those victims tolerance is evidence of meaningful public support. But, you can see why they might make those sorts of errors... given they were selected because of the fact in their sharing that exact set of failings in the ability to reason.

Shareholders generally aren't going to be overly interested in enabling that sort of criminal activity by a management, or their minions, who are violating shareholders rights, while they are deliberately engaged in violating the law, attempting to steal from them. And, when you see them proving their theft, AND their contempt for the law and the judges appointed to serve it... as well as their contempt for shareholders rights, while violating others right and interests, and the public interest ?

What should you expect ?

Shareholders' attorneys... probably aren't going to be stupid about seeking to protect the criminals from themselves and their own stupid choices... rather than seeking to expel them ?

And, here... they HAVE BEEN expelled, now... and replaced... partly because of shareholders persistent effort to have the issues be heard... and partly because the issues WERE heard by a judge who didn't appear willing to cooperate in enabling the clowns... much less willing to cooperate in playing the role of a clown himself...

What following your advocacy of what "they should have advised" would have proved, was only that the lawyers providing that advice were equally as corrupt, and criminal, as their clown clients were by following that advice to ignore a Delaware court order.

Following that advice would make those following it, as well as those providing it, into criminals ? Providing that advice... would make the lawyers into criminals... because the lawyers clients... were the COMPANY and its SHAREHOLDERS... and not the miscreants seeking to avoid accountability.

That we DID see the miscreants and their minions pretty clearly acting in ways showing they apparently were following that sort of advice... does still leave open the question of where that advice came from...

Not lost on me that the judge left that question dangling...

Although, it now looks to me a lot like a broad ax being held behind the receivers back...

CLYW holders are SO MUCH better off to have the receiver directing the company's affairs... instead of having the company run by the clowns...

Thank you, Judge Laster.

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/02/15/him-again-laster-rips-barclays-holds-up-del-monte-sale-to-pe-group/