News Focus
News Focus
icon url

dread50above

10/10/05 9:37 PM

#3594 RE: Invest1111 #3593

Lets say that they win and the contract that they signed is void. What does that say about their competence?

Once the court renders a decision, then we may find out more information about the circumstances that actually lead up to this becoming a legal matter. Until then, I don't think it is a matter of competency, per se. I still looks to me like a situation where, at best, the document was not filed as agreed to. We can spectulate all we want until the judge rules. The facts, as least as Torvec has presented them to the court, stand on their own.
icon url

Torvecian

10/11/05 10:03 AM

#3600 RE: Invest1111 #3593

Invest...

I have maintained that there is a large short position in Torvec....dreads info on the DTC sheet imbalances support my opinion...if it indicates that there is currently a 5,000,000 share short position in Torvec.....currently......

The stock has trended downward for the last 12 to 15 months..(interestingly, that is when CXO arrived)...The downward trend caused the short position to grow not shrink, the downward pressure fueled the sale momentum...that hasn't been fun to watch, however, it also means that whomever is short, has to cover....WHERE ARE THEY GOING TO GET 5,000,000 SHARES IN THE MIDDLE OF A TORVEC MONETIZING EVENT...??? They willnot get any of my shares until it hits double figures...Katy bar the door in the event of even a modest sized deal on any of Torvec's tech....

I have some opinions on the short players and connections but will not share that opinion here...