Replies to post #99955 on Rapid Fire Marketing Inc. (fka RFMK)

[duncansdad]

Can we continue this conversation in month...it will be much clearer for you then...trust me ;)

cheers

$RFMK $1

[lazyazzdaddy]

LOL, duncansdad, does "Apple" sound like a service or a product????, maybe both????, LOL, ANY acceptable word can be applied to either, when the examiner prosecutes Trademark applications, they allow the applicant to adjust the application and add further definition if they have questions, and as far as the examiner goes, they wont even consider RFMKs use of Cannacig since the USPTO only measures the application against applications filed with, and registrations awarded by, the USPTO, they do not consider any other marks!, if THC does land the mark, and granted, anything could happen in that respect, its going to prove to be 1 of the biggest bonehead moves that RFMK ever did, well maybe not, RFMK is also on record fraudulently stating in a PR that they filed for the Cannacig trademark back in January.

Your not serious, are you? I really think you should double check your facts on this one.. RFMK will have NO problem proving they have been using the name in commerce sense Feb. The best part is THC obviously knew RFMK was using the name in Commerce 1- because they actually bashed it in an open forum and 2- because RFMK had put out SEVERAL PR's which also used the name Cannacig..
Please, go ahead and tell me they had no Idea and did not do this with the intention to harm RFMK... IMO that was their intention all along..

I do though appreciate you taking the time to explain your opinion of how the USPTO works..but the FACT is, that's not even close.. Again, please do some DD on this..

AIMO
LAZY