Replies to post #124247 on Sarissa Resources Inc (SRSR)

[passthegravy]

DSU, this post is masterful and so, so on point.

[es1]

The anticipation is well founded because Scott created it.
So what is the difference between saying

The parties will enter into a definitive joint venture agreement (targeted by September 30th, 2012) upon obtaining approval of the appropriate Government Agencies.

and saying this

The parties will enter into a definitive joint venture agreement upon obtaining approval of the appropriate Government Agencies.

In the first statement informs and builds anticipation on sept 30. The second informs without building anticipation on a specific date.

Scott chose to put that target date in the statement.
What do you think he expected to happen on Oct 1 without news. The price was going to dip. Period.

I dont care who it was that sold when the 1st came around but you could bet 2 things would have happened had he not given that date. We would have popped up a little less than it did(maybe) and would have continued climbing slowly. It could have sustained an uptrend till end of year without the date included.

It is Scotts responsibility to think about the share holders at all times. It is as simple as not putting in the after thought of the date.

As for this...

"Sept 30 would have come with a JV"

That's a lie.

Totally quoted out of context and a lie in its own right.
What I said was

If every time Scott opened his mouth there was 100% chance he would come through we would not be in the .04s.
Sept 30 would have come with a JV and the PPS would be higher than it is.

This is 100% true

The facts are not something worth being on the defense about. Longs should not need to be biting the heads off people who question the fact that Scott has failed many times in the past and not followed through on dates before. It is a fact. Not a fatal flaw. And NOBODY here should be so afraid of the facts as to deny them.

There are many facts here that longs would say and I would agree with 100%. I would never argue them because they are facts. And I would not get offended by being shown those facts as proof of the past.
I think the longs should show confidence in the stock by speaking freely about the company's flaws and not trying to slam a lid on them and gag the person asking.

[Newbie_Niobium]

Post of this nature are why the pink sheets are such a mess.

People on the pinks expect nothing from their investments management.

Hopefully Scott will annoyance a completed JV in the coming days and this discussion will resolve itself. If not, we are back in the 2's at best.

IMO