News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Jerry7777

10/08/12 12:19 AM

#124255 RE: es1 #124252

Right or wrong --- it is possible that after ALL of this time, Scott feels somewhat like a "pin cushion" or a "dart board", and is just trying to lend some EN-"COURAGE"-MEANT to us/US stock-holders.

Are we ALL TOO or THREE --- UP-"TIGHT"!!!???
icon url

jpp09

10/08/12 12:59 AM

#124258 RE: es1 #124252

Totally agree, given the number of missed dates, failures, last springs "I know how you feel" PR, I had assumed that Scott would never again put out a date he could not meet. Yet he did it again. Luckily there is a lot of faith among shareholders. Not sure why I expected anything different, in hindsight should have flipped some shares (two years in a row now). We need news within the next two weeks or we are at .02 again. I don't need the "yay, I can buy more cheapies, yay" comments and yes that is a Crank Yankers Special Ed "yay".
icon url

jimHorse

10/08/12 9:48 AM

#124268 RE: es1 #124252

Very well said. I agree with this post 100%. I wish more people on this board had this point of view. Thanks for posting.

icon url

sarshee

10/08/12 10:37 AM

#124271 RE: es1 #124252

I agree whole heartedly with your assessment. Sarissa could and should have been able to maintain a higher pps if things had been better communicated and we had been kept better informed throughout the years. Just as the example you showed, the wording of the most recent PR could have made all the difference in expectations and we quite posssibly wouldn't have had the sell-off we just suffered. jmho

browndawg
icon url

JPS02

10/08/12 11:12 AM

#124276 RE: es1 #124252

I think the date is purposefully put with a strategy behind it.
icon url

Smooth

10/08/12 11:38 AM

#124286 RE: es1 #124252

es1...your post is spot on. Scott or Merl could have...even should have thought through the PR which "targeted the 30th" KNOWING the history of so many other company events that were delayed or simply never came to pass.

Simply thinking through the issues of this supposed Chinese deal with governmental sign off/approval required, they should have known that there existed the real possibility that approval might extend beyond the 30th. It should have been left as an open ended timeline or perhaps pushed out through Q4. I think that would have left open the real possibility that the pps could have steadily climbed though the delay like you said.

But, this is Monday morning quarterbacking. But I agree with your position.

But, the screw up...if this is one, has opened the door for acquiring more in the 3's.

Chart looking like crap...until it doesn't...lol! I hereby declare the daily chart to be null and void and only the weekly chart is to be viewed for guidance. If weekly breaks down, we shall focus on the monthly!