Okay, let me rephrase, one can't say that with 100% certainty and be correct. It's not a fact until it actually happens, no matter how many times it's uttered on this board.
imo, its likely that the sec's objection would most likely be the financial claims being made in thr pr's, thus the directive to provide audited financials..., the sec i gather is never/ hardly ever wrong,.. but would there have been an opposing force that would have complained about KMAG to the SEC, this would have taken time and dd, something a competitor would try, in order to blacken KMAG, just a thought and imo.
I you don't mind Janice, would you say that the SEC is not so much concerned with the accuracy of the PR's, but more so the fact that financials are not audited, do you get my drift.
The only reality is u can say anything u want, and say 100% all u want, but in this world it dosen't mean it's TRUE THATS A FACT 100%% and that is the only thig that is 100%. Quote Yes I can, and I just did. Reality is important
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
