Eprom, please, knock it off with the English lessons. You’re embarrassing even the most ardent NAUG supporters. That was one of the most disjointed, smoke-filled posts I have ever read. And then you go from the sublime to the ridicules with “...And I know of ZERO companies out there that set future goals at a lower amount than what they are currently producing right now.”
Now follow me closely on this one, A GOAL IS NOT A GUIDANCE, understand? I was referring to the company’s guidance. In fact, nearly all credible Big Board public companies will post a quarterly guidance on which the predicted value of their stock is based. If they miss the guidance number they will be punished by the market, it’s that simple.
You are still missing the point. The company has not yet delivered on a single significant promise . Next I suppose you’ll give Webster another workout and define “significant” for us all. You really need to quit while you are only this far behind. Especially considering Arbpro, a genuine master of the printed word, has not yet weighed in on your latest rants.
Sir Dog
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
