Replies to post #110603 on KMA Global Solutions International (KMAG)

[dworb]

Lowman, I love that you're here! You bring neutral perspective with a much appreciated knowledge of this craft! I am definitely an admiring follower!

[todamoonerpump]

man u know your chit low ..stickie this one to the top da lowman is back in the game ...load the boat if we dip low cause this puppy is comin back ..nothing has changed jr still aggressivly growing the company and big dual/gemini contracts are on the way ..would love it if jr pr a walmart or pennys contract now ..in there face...

[doogdilinger]

Hey lowman...I checked KMAG's 15-12G going dark filing from 4 years ago out of curiosity to see what boxes were checked and noticed they checked

Rule 12g-4(a)(1) & Rule 12h-3(b)(1)(i)

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=6154004


So I'm not sure if their original going dark 15-12G filing from 4 years ago has anything to do with the out of the blue SEC suspension yesterday...but check out the verbage on slide 14 of this link below...as I have no clue if KMAG does have over 300 shareholders of record now...but if they do have over 300 SOR perhaps Jeff Reid didn't realize his SEC reporting obligations had been automatically re-instated because of it???

I personally never realized that a 15-12G going dark filing was really just a temporary suspension of SEC reporting obligations until I read the following slides...in particular slide 14 which may have something to do with why Jeff Reid didn't see the out of the blue SEC suspension coming???

"Thus, if the number of stockholders of a company subsequently increases to more than 300, a company’s SEC reporting obligations will be reinstated"

http://www.slidefinder.net/g/going_dark_what_companies_need/goingdark/17403106