WB, Not that there's anything wrong with being biased, as long as you don't pretend that you are not.
I already expalined AMD's partner centric, vendor centric, consumer centric parameters that have a liberating affect vs Intel's leverage, etc. I dislike the "might makes right mentality". There is my bias.
Paul Engle used to be open in his contempt for AMD. He reasoned AMD if successful, would (hurt Intel) commoditize processors (who dare compete with the mighty jugernaut). ;)
You OTOH only say thing like this platform will catch up or some reasoning why Intel will do well financially. As if you want to jump/stay on the winning bandwagon, "things haven't gone well, but are supposed to turn, while AMD might run to 30", your aproximate words.
You,ve been around long enough to see that those who thought Intel groth would compound forever were wrong.
What made you decide and keeps you believing Intel was/is the holy grail?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
