News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Kadin

08/29/12 11:05 AM

#203729 RE: B402 #203727

Great summation B402...re-visit the facts...

Only changes - Canco LOI PUMP & S/1 Amendments...
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=73970910

Vale is Off the Bonavista
Vale is out of the Exploration Business
So much for the VEC Agreement

The Company is Broke
Has been since Drilling
That Alone Says The Most

The much touted N Lucky was cancelled
The New S Lucky claims are VEC leftovers

They Cancelled The Rusty 102 Claim
Showing the ploy used on shareholders
Rusty is a Cornerstone Leftover

They Won't PR anything
Making the CEO a Coward
He was pretty mouthy when things were being Pumped

Assets Have Been moved
Months ago
an S1 is needed but not filed
If one is...Its a Yr give or take before SEC approval

Last Years PRs turned out to be mostly Bunk
especially the Distro
That too needs an S1

The Share structure is used up
Only 600k was spent exploring
Less when you consider The Grant or Grants

Yea,,,A lot of facts need Re-Visited
Considering so many are Ignored

One last Note
Best Katx has done
Is Pump then Dump

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/KATX/financials
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=news&symbol=NO%5eKATX
icon url

Kadin

08/29/12 3:21 PM

#203767 RE: B402 #203727

Debunking 'Misinformation'...Well done B402!!!

Hopefully it will reduce the continued misinformation and one would hope to stay adequately informed, especially when dealing with the OTC...

To reiterate the integrity of this DD...
Investigations by the SEC Commission...
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=79033124

SEC Confirmed Information...
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79045942

Quote within a Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No telephone conversation about any info will be discussed, that's the rule.
Also, when send in letters etc, must include personal pictured ID and proof of shareholder-ownership documents
Otherwise, it will be treated as rubbish--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'Is Complete and total Bunk'

My personal experience is that I got his voice mail
And he returned my calls in the afternoon

Now, email is used

Although a conversation with Larry
may not be like one may think

He cannot tell you if That S1 will Pass or This S1A etc
Or If there is a current investigation Blah Blah

They are quite open to information shared
He will pass information along to the proper departments

Can explain the correspondences with the company..

He will also tell you that the SEC does not Deal with, Merit,,
But does deal in Disclosure and Fraud Issues
Both have lenghthy meanings...

And will discuss The Company's Requirements
Tell you the SEC's Concerns and Duties

I can say however, he is aware of Katx/Bvig
Has recieved and Ever Growing number of calls..(And Complaints)
And understands the Very Nature of Pink/OTC

He is quite eagar to Help, Listen, and Learn.

Again
One may thumb through this..written by..The SEC
http://www.sec.gov/investor/pubs/microcapstock.htm
There is more than one that fit the bill on Katx/Bvig
some would say it all does,, Lol ;)

But
There is One that is Painfully Obvious...to This board
And the SEC can access any and all needed records

When you Lump it together
Put it in a Pile
It Stinks

OTC Style
__________________________________________________________________


To reiterate when/IF the SEC declares the prospectus as “effective,” or in legal compliance...

It's not a recommendation to buy as a good investment.

The prospectus may be distributed to potential investors, but it’s still preliminary and contains the red warning notice.

The prospectus is supposed to contain all material information about the offering. So the last thing their firm’s legal advisers want is for some company representative to make an off-the-cuff remark that’s not in the prospectus, that someone later on tries to construe as relevant. HINT - AFFIDAVIT

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=78932528


“Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored”.




icon url

wshaw14

09/01/12 6:04 AM

#204056 RE: B402 #203727

Really? Who is Bob Norberg and how is he tied to KATX? Who is Manjit? What does he currently have to do with KATX?? LOI? This is a letter of intent, right? Simply means "we will take a look" Right? LOIs happen every day. The percentage of completion is kind of low. Please explain your point. The letter of intent was rejected? So why in your opinion does it mean squat?
icon url

mappo

12/30/12 7:53 AM

#210314 RE: B402 #203727

all that had nothing to do with KATX.
No proof that KATX had anything to do with all the names you mentioned.



.