Absolutely incorrect. The sole reason the share price is where it is has to do with drilling 5 wells and coming up (supposedly) empty. If we had hit oil while drilling, I could have been running the company and we would be valued much, much higher then we are now. Your share price theory is based on a false premise, imo. Therefore, everything you build off of that false initial premise would also be incorrect. It is my belief that if I didn't think this Mgmt team could create shareholder value by acquiring rights to prospective oil properties AND find a way to develop said oil properties, there would be no reason for me to be invested in this stock. But thats just me. To each their own.