Replies to post #6280 on Zeev's Turnips Talk Politics (ZTTP)

[brainlessone]

i think it was an inartful reminder that homosexuality, by nature, suffers the same consequences as the Shakers

[mlsoft]

sarai....

I do not understand your answer - in his post, he talked about the homosexual community calling anyone who questions their "lifestyle" all kinds of names, and that is indeed the case. Yet you characterize the target of those names as hateful and harmful. A bit hypocritical, is it not??

I think you are just as guilty of all the very things you accuse others of.

mlsoft

[profit_guy]

sarai, i am just stating biological facts...i am not saying i hate homosexuals, but while i do tolerate it, i don't accept it as normal behaviour...it's deviant behaviour plain and simple...i find it quite amazing that when someone like me objects to their deviant behaviour, that they try to justify it by saying it's normal, and that people who object are homophobics, blah blah...and lastly, what i truly find amazing is same sex couples who adopt...let them make their OWN kids, if their union is SO NORMAL!

...funny how politicians never speak up like this...oh no, instead they just lie to people, and tell them what they want to hear

[Zeev Hed]

Come on, which word exactly expressed hate? The worst I could find was "deviant", which in my book means "strays from the norm", that is what homosexuality is, it strays from the norm. For religious people it is indeed an abomination (not the people, the act), just like murders (the acts) are abomination (and for true Christians, for instance, the murderers are not an abomination and repentance gets them back in favor with the all mighty). I may not agree with that last tenet of Christianity, but it surely is not hateful to characterize some acts as deviant or abomination.