I was looking at the maps just today, I believe it does and the strongest showings, but I am not sure I am looking at the maps correctly as to exactly how the claims lie. Maybe somebody else can chime in? This is what I am going by. http://www.northerndynastyminerals.com/ndm/PD_MM.asp Even if not correct, there are many anomalies that can be proven. I am just hoping they are shallow and easy to prove up for obvious reasons.
I don't believe that NAK/PLP even drilled the area next/adjacent to where we will be drilling. But if you look at page 29 of the PARTB (page 29 in reference to the scribd browser itself) then look at page 34 you will see that the area we are going to drill "DEFINITELY" would have an ore body that overlaps or runs into the NAK/PLP border.
It shows page 61 at the top of the report, but you have to look at the lower right hand corner of the scribd browser window and you will see page 1 to 134 of PART B.
We don't see any further south than our border outline, but you can DEFINITELY tell that the borders are on a REAL ANOMALY !!!!
That's it from me for now - back to filling out paperwork to try and get my lease.
Have a great weekend AHEAD ALL FELLOW LBSR INVESTORS !!!
Here is how they answered your question on the LBSR facebook site:
Liberty Star Uranium & Metals Corp. Land borders are a human construct. Ore bodies have nothing to do with them. As far as I know, the limits of the Pebble deposit have yet to be defined. 5 hours ago ·