I have read the total agreement.
It is not clear what point you are making other than a cut and paste, which is not a point.
The construct of the original argument is:
1) Where in the agreement does it state "commercialize", the term that Steipp and Chung are bandying about on 8K's and 10K's?
2) If it is not in the MTA specifically, then why are they specifically, NOT ONCE, but REPEATEDLY, using the term commercialize?
3) And, where is there any INCENTIVE for AAPL to utilize our TRADE DRESS.
So, Chris, the framework of the argument was TRADE DRESS and COMMERCIALIZE.
Please explain what specific parts of your "cut and paste" apply to these two points of discussion.
I do agree that everyone should read this annex.......
but why do you point it out in relation to the points at issue?