News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Kalinn

07/08/12 11:33 PM

#2307 RE: olddogwithnewtrix #2306

SBFM have always had problems getting exposure, maybe it's because they're based in Canada, I don't know, but with the recent volume peaks it appears a lot of people have discovered it and become aware of its enormous potential

Cammy
icon url

biomanbaba

07/09/12 1:01 AM

#2308 RE: olddogwithnewtrix #2306

sounds like a Bargain to me. Promoters are like Lawyers...they work for any body who has their fee. Work they do for slimballs like the junior miners has given them a bad name in some circles...Now when a promotion covers a scam we call that FRAUD and when it covers a legitimate product we call it ADVERTIZING. I think the product here falls in the latter category
icon url

Doc_John

07/09/12 1:21 AM

#2309 RE: olddogwithnewtrix #2306

I don't buy it!
icon url

biomanbaba

07/09/12 1:28 AM

#2310 RE: olddogwithnewtrix #2306

DID some research on you and your post....found only one reference to what you say on the internet...articles by this guy
http://www.pennystockresearch.com/stock-analysts/brian-walker/
He certainly seems to be a HACK with an agenda....A retread from Morgan and Bear...fired in the 2008 disaster...bounced around and ended up writing for this RAG publication...has never seen a stock under a $ he wasnt sure was a pump and dump...a look at your posting history leads me to believe you MIGHT BE HIM or at least an employee of that company...looking to make him look good for whatever purpose..your salary...your bonus
icon url

biomanbaba

07/09/12 2:27 AM

#2314 RE: olddogwithnewtrix #2306

I would put it to YOU...the SHORTS need a counter-weight to all the positives about the company discussed here...lest they BE SQUEEZED...reminds me of MR Whipple saying "Dont squeeze the SBFM shorts"...well I squeezed the CHARMIN ...I have no respect for the shorts here...I will squeeze their balls till their voices change
icon url

biomanbaba

07/09/12 3:42 AM

#2316 RE: olddogwithnewtrix #2306

a good way to lose credibility. another way to do that is to bring CRAP published by the Hack Brian Walker here

BRIAN WALKER...author of your article ie negative on SBFM
is a washed up POS who can no longer find a Job doing what he would really like to do....I would invite the board to read
Charles Gasparino...the SELLOUT if they havent already
http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=charles+gasparino&tag=mh0b-20&index=stripbooks&hvadid=21579465&ref=pd_sl_91tx4q0rdx_p
and delve into all the slime he and his cohorts did at their former
employer...while they were running the company INTO THE GROUND....it is one of my favorite books
icon url

ronpopeil

07/09/12 7:59 AM

#2334 RE: olddogwithnewtrix #2306

I haven't read or seen this alert. I don't believe it was released on yahoo. I don't know what kind of promotion this was as it didn't seem to be widely distributed to the public. For me, all that matters are the results. So far, preclinical data is very impressive. Of course, it's just preclinical data. The company needs to file the IND and begin human testing. If results are confirmed, the stock will do very well and the company could seriously look to big pharma for a partnership or even a buyout. I bought in around .20 because the risk/reward looked very intriguing. The float is small and i love that they are working to find a treatment for breast cancer. Although money is currently tight, they have collaborations with university hospitals and are receiving grants so they are able to keep the lights on for now. These small bio plays are always a crap shoot but if they hit, you could make a lot of money. PCYC was a penny stock a few years ago. THLD was around $1 back in February. You never know. Let's get this IND filed first and see what happens.