Replies to post #4580 on Just Politics

[fuagf]

many whites voting for Obama says nothing about racism being 'entrenched where it exists
now' .. it only says what we know, that many Americans are not racist and vote for the
candidate they think best .. we have no doubt on which side most of the racism exists ..

You give these as "some examples of "racial rage" on this board:

>> Who rankles at anything Allan West has to say?

>> Who detested every word the "Godfathers" candidate said?

>> Who despises C. Rice being a part of GWB team?

>> Who was it that actually "hated" the black guy on the TEA PARTY EXPRESS (bus) team?"

my rankling at everything that Beck and Limbaugh say, except good night .. how would
that make me racist? .. how are any of those, in themselves, examples of racial rage?

[fuagf]

MysteryZ .. my point was that a victory for Republican's would entrench racism where it exists now, that
would not be a good thing .. and would legitimize the "political vindictiveness ("make Obama a one term
president" at any cost .. " of the Republican Party, and that that would not be a good thing either.

Do you agree or disagree with one or more of those?

.. am sorry i have to ask you that again

[BullNBear52]

And there are no racists here?

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=77133659

I'm selling stock in a bridge in Brooklyn.

[fuagf]

Social Security isn't '21st century slavery'

By Steve Benen - Mon Jul 9, 2012 4:47 PM EDT

"Let me give you some examples of "racial rage" on this board:

>> Who rankles at anything Allan West has to say?" [my blue]

Rep. Allen West, the unhinged Florida Republican, appears to have reached some strict rules regarding his foes. If you dare disagree with him, West believes you're either (a) a communist; (b) a supporter of slavery; .. http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/07/03/12543353-allen-west-cant-help-himself?lite .. or (c) quite possibly a communistic supporter of slavery.

Igor Volsky flags .. http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/07/08/512579/allen-west-social-security-benefits-are-a-form-of-modern-21st-century-slavery/ .. the congressman's latest gem.

For those who can't watch clips online, West complained about those who've sought Social Security disability benefits. "[W]e are creating the sense of economic dependence, which to me is a form of modern, 21st century slavery," he said.

Putting aside West's preoccupation with comparing everything he doesn't like to slavery -- really, congressman, it's time for a new metaphor .. http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/08/18/7406441-up-from-slavery-metaphors?lite .. -- the argument here is especially bizarre. If Americans qualify for Social Security disability benefits, they're relying on a safety net that's keeping them out of poverty. They're not living on easy street -- you won't see these folks attending any fundraisers in the Hamptons -- but SSI helps beneficiaries, many of whom are children, from being destitute.

By West's reasoning, that makes them slaves. Of course, by that logic, any group of Americans who rely on public institutions are also slaves. Do you rely on public schools to provide your kids with an education? Then you're a victim to public dependence, which to West is a form of modern, 21st century slavery. Are you a senior citizen who relies on Medicare to see a doctor? Then you're a victim, too, and are necessarily some kind of slave in Allen West's mind.

Of course, West isn't the only strange person with odd ideas about slavery. Did you catch Herman Cain last week?

The former Pokemon-quoting presidential candidate was troubled by Chris Rock's Independence Day comments, in which the comedian called the 4th of July "white peoples independence day."

Cain was unimpressed .. http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/05/herman-cain-quotes-chris-rock-to-slam-white-peoples-independence-day-joke/ ..(thanks to reader F.B. for the tip).

"I think it was Chris Rock who made fun of the fact, 'Well, it might be Independence Day, but the slaves
weren't free then.' Look at it this way, if America had not become independent, slaves might still be slaves."

As a matter of history, that doesn't make any sense at all. If the United States were still under the crown, African Americans might still be slaves? There's no real ambiguity here: the United Kingdom banned slavery in 1833. Parts of Canada ended the slave trade as far back as 1793. The United States didn't end slavery until after the Civil War in 1865.

The only way slavery would have continued is if the South had won the Civil War --
and apparently some on the right now believe that wouldn't have been so bad. ..
http://entertainment.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/07/06/12603883-ted-nugent-it-might-have-been-best-if-south-won-civil-war?lite

http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/07/09/12646225-social-security-isnt-21st-century-slavery?lite

MysteryZ .. lol .. i feel now, hope anyway .. heh .. you understand your "racial rage" examples were
only your perception of the words meaning .. you introduced the race card there (as it was introduced
in Obama's campaign against Hillary, just to let you know i understand both sides bear that guilt.)

Rachel, and so many others, including me, are just rankled by what, West, says.
(those commas are are a bit much and not really needed there doncha thank? LOL)

The blue is there to make sure YOU get it.