Replies to post #189504 on Plastic2Oil Inc (PTOI)

[fourkids_9pets]

we will agree to disagree

not to reiterate *again* but i called for *volume*
to enter JBII post PROS' digestion of the open mkt
buys on 5.22.12 >> once that info along with pipe
investors was *shown and known* >> because i knew
that the pattern via daily reg sho would have to change

>> they had 2 choices >>
either show the real percentages >> via daily reg
sho *imo* depending on legit buys running from
60 to 90 percent daily or *dilute* those percentages
via air shares >> real shocker that yet again for another month
PROS would NSS JBII >> NOT

reminder of open mkt buy

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=76020839&txt2find=open|market

==

and since the PROS' pattern on JBII is clearly *established*
i along with others *noted* >> which MMs' >> did what

Ryoko

Share
Thursday, June 07, 2012 12:29:04 PM
Re: jcoukr post# 186290

Post # of 189397

CANT has unloaded around 400K shares so far. That's a lot. But it does seem they are unwilling to drive it under $1. I'm wondering if the entire 3M that's come off restriction are going to hit the open market during this fire sale.

NITE has just leapfrogged them on the Ask. Let's see how anxious they are to stay on top of the Ask.

which is also explained in this *detailed* post >> telling the tale of two *patterns* in JBII
(volume wise for the month of JUNE)

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=77115226

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=77180684

but mostly what is laid out for all to see is the *seemingly* end to CSTI's >> *RUN*
as the secondary MM to JBII's PRIMARY MM >> via CANT's *emergence* in the no. 2 spot
in jUNE >> as i noted tho' .. i'd be more inclined to *buy* it if their *totals* didn't so closely
align with >> CSTI

CANT over shot
CSTI stayed below

all of that FACTUAL DATA >> covering CSTI's *reign* >> as the SECONDARY MM >> is via
this post

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=77147915

oh and i can't (pun intended) ignore the attempts to implicate PIPE investors >> which
i also *called* for >> i posted blame would be fostered off on new pipe investors

then when those certs weren't cut (issued) by the TA >> the *blame was fostered*
off on prior pipe investors

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=76400418&txt2find=blame

====

i have no doubts that *threshold* (for the most part) is tightly CONtrolled by the PROS

i have no doubts as to which month and year >> the legal short in JBII went to abusive status
i have no doubts there is a 10M NSS position in JBII (that is my public no. posted)
i have no doubts that each month *resets* are done via various colluding entities
to avoid *reporting* >> er >> specifics to FINRA >> adding to a well stocked pile
i have no doubts >> that some other *entity* besides myself is documenting JBII's trading data
i have no doubts that an *orchestrated* run on JBII is coming

i have no doubts about what senior mgmt has to share with those invested

i also have no doubts that only a master strategist (former ceo) could out think the
cretinous filth >> and *maintain silence* for those events (march/april and half of may)
literally BLINDSIDING the PROS >> who are almost always able to CONtrol CONtent and
OUTcomes >> 99% of the time >>

sort of like pavlov's dog

what i don't know is what pps *triggers* a partial or total cover >> best guesstimate
i can give is 4.20 >> triggers the next *leg or as i call it ladder* >> UP

it could be 3.20 >> it could be 5.20 >> but it's not too far removed from last year's
>> er >> orchestrated *run and high*

imo

and last my response to another's POV

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=76704048

as i've noted numerous times >> my interpretation and analysis >> is just that >> MINE

it's done based on my tracking data specific to JBII >> trades >> MMs' *active* >> daily
reg sho >> ancillary activity specific to authored hit pieces >> and my own DD re: co.
activity

this analysis of mine can be embraced or discarded by each individual who reads this smb



==
4kids
all jmo

[BigBake1]

Brilliant post and absolutely correct, the issue is not an Abusive NSS problem, the trading activity proves this, further it will show as stated in the coming FTD reports. Someone is eating a huge amount of rejected fees and this will all be disclosed through various reports including the 10Q covering this period, showing the conversion of restricted shares to free trading.


Simply put, someone jumped the gun and sold shares that had yet to be approved by the company and TA to be converted to free trading resulting in a block of rejected shares that could not be delivered until it was resolved.

[P2O I'm from MO]

Thank you for that well reasoned and intelligent and articulate post. It clearly indicates what has been transgressing and doesn't rely on the nebulous conspiracy theories involving many third party organizations, regulators, and market makers or invisible patterns and signals for validation. Your analysis is sound and more than plausible given the facts at hand.