Replies to post #20519 on Cyclone Power Technologies, Inc. (fka CYPW)

[Intuitions25]

yeah, lets talk about the lawn equipment again for the 15th time (yes I'm counting)


AS YOU KNOW, they announced that their resources were more valuable going towards producing engines that sold for $200,000 an engine (Raytheon) versus $200 an engine (Revgine). Raytheon has also been providing other types of support to help with Cyclone's path (like independently verifying Cyclone's technology). What's so hard to understand about this? I'm pretty sure going with Raytheon versus going with another STARTUP company was a MUCH BETTER CHOICE. Revgine ended up going under anways!

What is so complicated in understanding this issue?


Why don't you ask Chuk that question? Chuk supplied the chasis and Cyclone was providing the engine. Obviously if they plan to run the car in August, there's no problem with the engine.

[Cee-It]

If management had focused all of their time, money and energy on any one of those failures then they could have given up when it was delayed, sidetracked or failed.

Instead the company has a wonderful and diverse foundation of products and project capabilities emerging. That will further enhance profits, efficiency and their ability to react to changing market demand during economic change.