News Focus
News Focus
icon url

MikeHawk01

06/12/12 11:23 PM

#106221 RE: bassilious #106219

From who?
icon url

DiabloDeBlanco

06/12/12 11:27 PM

#106223 RE: bassilious #106219

BS or not I still appreciate something to combat the negative bs. I've been here for a long time and am one of the lucky ones to still be green but this is why I rarely if ever post. I'll go back below the radar now GL
icon url

DrPope

06/12/12 11:27 PM

#106224 RE: bassilious #106219

Not to burst your ego but the SEC has more important things to do. You couldn't get on their radar if tried. Just post it or don't mention it again.
icon url

kick69

06/13/12 12:45 AM

#106234 RE: bassilious #106219

Copy and Paste it them but x out the names and stuff - the sooner you do it the more likely people will believe it. It could be very encouraging to us.

As for the earlier email regarding BK

lets use some Basic reasoning to discredit this information
1) Fact - They hired a CRO which are used for many reasons including helping a company RESTRUCTURE during BK
2) If they were going to declare BK they would be planning to restructure as again they hired a CRO. If they had no plans to restructure I believe the court would provide a trustee
3) OK so if they are going BK and planning on restucturing they would NEVER cancel contracts with customers or tell them they are going BK. Why would you kill your revenue stream when you need it the most. At the very least you want to keep bringing in revenue even during BK process to help pay down debts.