Replies to post #63000 on MediaG3 (MDGC)

[Cassandra]

That's the kind of license documentation that Val Westergard has never been able to provide in support of his fantastical claims of providing wireless broadband Internet services.

Excellent research as alway jb!

[cyberbullymouse]

Excellent work. And Val can't provide this for himself, at the same address... why?

LOL

Crumbly house of cards wants to keep the focus on the owner from 3 years ago for quite obvious reasons.

[colemano]

Is this a joke? What frequency are the church radios ("90.35a - RADIOS USED FOR CHURCH COMMUNICATIONS") using? Obviously a frequency that requires an FCC licence:

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title47-vol5/pdf/CFR-2010-title47-vol5-sec90-35.pdf

MDGC uses frequencies that do not require a licence from the FCC:

The MG3 Wireless Network can be customized to operate on unlicensed or licensed radio frequencies up to 90 Ghz.

(See, Annual Report p. 8 of 52).

MediaG3 Wireless offers a variety of fixed and wireless broadband products, services and solutions referred to as wireless networks, access points or micro cells; using a hybrid of wired, 802.11, 802.16 and Local Multipoint Distribution Systems (LMDS) which may use licensed or unlicensed frequencies.

(See, Annual Report p. 6 of 52).

I'd say, MDGC has something special to offer:

We believe no other company is able to offer the same or similar bandwidth and high frequency for a comparable price.

(See, Annual Report p. 21 of 52).

Throw something irrelevant against the wall again. Maybe it will stick next time.

[PaulHornung]

I am happy to help here... My sister, a former Idaho Deputy Attorney General, now works for the Catholic Church here in Boise. I will give her a call tomorrow (after Mass) for some guidance as to whom I should contact regarding lease details and equipment installed on the roof. No need for Val to prove any ownership of equipment any more, as I have the right contacts (spiritual and otherwise) to assist.

[PaulHornung]

These are exactly the licenses that MDGC would be required to have that I have been asking for evidence of. If you search the FCC website you will not see any applications or licenses in MDGC's name... Once again, it is difficult to prove a negative, but if this is the positive they are hanging their hat on... God forbid (pun intended)!