Replies to post #20891 on The Question and Answer Board (IHUB)

[ucansee]

Matt: He spammed us with the JAMBRA stuff for days - over and over. Several folks replied. He kept posting it.

I might add here that he began this campaign when you released him from posting his "conditions". That's about the time he put the other edig board up (something I certainly would've booted him for if it were my decision since it was a flagrant violation).

Then there were all these posts about "we" are investigating.

Finally, we have the SEC implication today. Oh, and the JAMBRA information spammed a couple of times again.

Exactly how many times do we have to have the board disrupted? Twice? Three Times? Is there a number?

And then there is the SEC implication. It's all a ruse, IMO. Could there be something to it? As berge said, I suppose it's possible at any company.

So, my final question to you is, why does he get to do all of this - to DISRUPT the board like this - to start a board illegally - to spam - and still maintain privelege to post?

[Susie924]

Matt,
I remember when this used to be a Q & A board.
With all of the new members that joined during the MDC, there might be some who have a question or 2 to ask but realize that if they come here all questions might be lost in the shuffle.
Can't you set up another board just for EDIG Q & A's?
This is getting tired for people who don't really give a darn what happens.
Now where is that ignore button????

[The Original dpb5!]

Matt...

Quite a while ago you had instituted a pair of handcuffs as a gif next to a user's name if he was in JAIL, and allowed us to search the term "JAIL" and click on members to see a list of who all was currently in JAIL.

Only Willy Wizard and Joemoney ever appeared on that list.

Did you abandon the idea altogether? If so, why? I still think it was a neat way to see who is in the slammer in a quick fashion.

[Bob Zumbrunnen]

IF I'm following the chain of posts correctly, he compiled several SEC documents showing issues with the JAMBRA thing, which then led to the post about the SEC and others having concern...which was prompted by CDR quizzing on his reasons for compiling it.

If true, I wasn't aware of that. Not a smoking gun, but it would move "possible" to "cause for concern".

[Patricia_1]

Why not discuss EDIG on the EDIG board Matt.

I thought this was 'The Question and Answer Board' for IHUB, not EDIG.