Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't he document why the SEC might be interested in EDIG because of something do with Jambra (sp?) or something of the like?
It's not like he came out and said "Expect and SEC halt. Trust me."
IF I'm following the chain of posts correctly, he compiled several SEC documents showing issues with the JAMBRA thing, which then led to the post about the SEC and others having concern...which was prompted by CDR quizzing on his reasons for compiling it.
What's so terrible about that?
As a matter of credibility, has anybody attempted to track the "calls" of anybody vs BA or TOF? Afterall, it's about money. I'd be listening to whoever's right. Don't get me wrong. I've made money on plenty of stocks with "bashers" .. when I know they are idiots or lying, I trade the opposite and win. But that takes a lot of research. The best way, that I've learned to not pay attention to one side or the other is based on how they speak. If they are always using vulgarities, "moron", "idiot" and such, ignore them. They are clueless. But if they are providing charts, links, talking clearly, they probably did their research and know what's going on. Again, this is just me.
