News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Nabbbss

05/22/12 5:12 PM

#79924 RE: Erik Caldwell #79922

Erik, there could be several justifiable reasons CEO Danny Alex
ran (past tense) occasional "promos."

1) To TRY to lift-UP the Share-Price, THEREBY making the Stock
AND the Company appear more substantial, significant, viable,
and CREDIT-worthy (i.e., LOAN-worthy). This reason alone often
justifies resorting or relying on the occasional "promo" campaign --
ESPECIALLY for emerging Micro-Cap Companies whose very VISIBILITY
is hampered and impeded because they tend to become lost-in-the-clutter.

2) To TRY to improve/increase Shareholder Value, or the Value
of Shareholders'/Investors' Shareholdings.

3) To burnish and buff-up the Company's and the Stock's well-being,
and to pull-out the Stock from its momentary doldrums.

4) To generate SOME modicum of new, fresh visibility for the
Company, AND to reap a new harvest of "new blood" Investors,
AND to stir-up a little FUN AND EXCITEMENT along the way.

5) At least for the interim, to respond to and mollify the
Shareholding/Investing Community during the often excruciatingly
lengthy times between Quarters.

6) To lob a little firecracker or grenade so-as to call attention
to the Company, and create an element of SURPRISE!

icon url

thatguy157

05/22/12 5:16 PM

#79925 RE: Erik Caldwell #79922

I guess he wanted awareness for the financial release for the benefit of his shareholders. The PPS will increase with the company success and people need to be aware of what is happening that are not already here.

If this was a pump and dump, where was the dump? Where is the salesman and how come he is not selling anything? I don’t think he should have used the same company if he was going to do it. Simple business concept if the PPS is evaluated lower than company values it, then company expands slowerer on free cash flow, if the PPS is higher than the small amounts of dilution is perfectly acceptable to speed expansion. With free cash flow brings options that are in the best interest of shareholders.

8 months ago I might have given some of this negativity the benefit of the doubt because the company had to dilute to operate.Now the company has the option to wait to see if the market catches up to the success of the company and "adjust" (change mind {I know happens in business sometimes}).

Dilution at this level to expand is not in the best interest of shareholders, If the PPS were .015 then 5 mil shares dilution for a new store is perfectly acceptable in my mind. Promo or awareness campaign helped Danny make that decision easy I believe. =IMO

GLTA
GO BRAV