The point I was trying to make is that people argue that the PPS is unimportant, then say the opposite when it's something Danny does. You bring up another pet peeve of mine. Why is it that whenever I bring up the past, it's "oh that's the past, don't worry about it", but nobody else has a problem bringing up the past when it suits them? ALL financial institutions look at the past. Why do you think Danny had to dilute so much instead of getting a bank loan like a legitimate business? The banks did not trust him based on his track record, but there is always someone here to fall for his sales pitch and talk others into following along. Danny has done some good things. Some GREAT things. But he has also done many bad things and the fact that he still walks in the shadows gives the impression that he is still doing them. You said you've been here for a year so I understand how you may not see the whole picture. Talk to some of the people that bought in 3 or 4 years ago and you'll get a different story. I can forgive Danny's past mistakes, but I cannot forget them and that makes me extra cautious with my money in relation to BRAV. To do otherwise would make me a fool.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
